|
Near East and Africa Security Framework (NEASFram)
Introduction
The next two years will see the
Washington policy community, along with a host of
politicians aspiring to become the next President,
lay out a series of recommendations pertaining to
the challenges facing the U.S. vis-à-vis
Iraq , Iran and Israel-Palestine. The majority of these
proposals will be hampered from the outset because
they will be siloed in their approach (an inevitable
consequence of “conventional” thinking
coupled with a perceived need to develop policy for
an inside the beltway audience) and will avoid taking
controversial stances.
A siloed approach to U.S. foreign policy that does
not tackle the most difficult challenges is destined
to fail as it will inevitably lead to the same types
of mistakes made by U.S. governments in years past.
Adhering to strictly drawn parameters around foreign
policy dialogue is a hallmark of failure and it is
past time that the U.S. foreign policy community looks
at a broad, and growing, range of critical challenges
in a holistic, interconnected and comprehensive way.
Near East and Africa
The majority of these challenges
can be found within the arc of territory that runs
from Istanbul in the northwest to Sudan and Somalia
in the southwest and New Delhi in the east, as well
as Africa .
We strongly believe that the only
sustainable solutions to these crises lie within
a methodology that recognizes the interconnected
nature of these challenges; the reality is that the
U.S. wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the Pakistani-Indian
dispute over Kashmir, the Israeli-Arab conflict over
Palestinian independence and water and land resources,
the escalating conflict with Iran, the escalating
conflicts in the Horn of Africa and in Sudan, and
Turkey and Iran’s tensions with
an Iraqi Kurdistan are all interconnected -- not merely
geographically, but also economically, politically,
and even demographically. Doing the easy and obvious
thing – say, for example, invading Iraq – almost
never produces the desired outcome. Instead,
any effort to solve any of these narrow issues in isolation
from the others merely creates new challenges elsewhere.
A focus on solving these interlinked
crises via a comprehensive agreement or set of agreements
should be the cornerstone of U.S. foreign policy
in the coming months and years. Our vision of a Near
East and Africa Security Framework can be pursued
through multiple parallel, but interrelated tracks
and will require an unprecedented multilateral approach
by the United States . We will need to work
more closely with key partners outside and inside
the region.
Of course, for this to take place,
we will first need to rediscover how these conflict
areas are all related. It
has been conventional wisdom throughout the world,
except in Washington , that the on-going Israeli conflicts
with its Arab neighbors and the failure to create a
Palestinian state have fuelled anti-American flames
throughout the region. Less well known is how
instability in Pakistan , partly as a result of the
unresolved dispute with India over Kashmir, has fueled
a puritanical version of Sunni Islam that has destabilized
both Pakistan and Afghanistan , or provided a safe
haven for al-Qaeda. The connections are sometimes
gross and sometimes subtle. But they are there
and need to be dealt with as part of an effort to move
U.S. policy beyond simplistic “war on terror” tactics
that frame complex interlinked issues as “you
are with us or against us.”
An attempt at creating a comprehensive
framework that recognizes that there are far more
shared interests within the region itself and with
its external neighbors could create a truly unique
partnership modeled more on the US-European relationship
than on past colonial methodologies.
We recognize that significant political capital is
needed to simply acknowledge such an interconnected
region and a much more significant diplomatic structure
will be needed to secure a sweeping set of interrelated
agreements. Nevertheless we believe that all the countries
in the arc would benefit from a change in the status
quo and would give up something to gain real security.
|